Movie Review: Dunkirk

Dunkirk is a masterfully crafted, riveting and rousing epic that captures the isolation, desperation, tragedy, and solidarity in a historic event thanks to a well-executed script, nerve-jangling musical score, immersive sound design, stunning cinematography and sympathetic performances.

Dunkirk opens as hundreds of thousands of British and Allied troops are surrounded by enemy forces. Trapped on the beach with their backs to the sea they face an impossible situation as the enemy closes in. [Warner Bros.]

Christopher Nolan – like Spielberg in Normandy and Clint Eastwood in Iwo Jima – makes his own mark on war movies in Dunkirk. You can expect great movies from great directors, but that fact still leaves you with an indelible mark once you see it onscreen.

Dunkirk,  even judging by the trailers alone, is a technical masterpiece. From the period accurate costumes to the immersive sound design to the nerve-jangling musical score and to the sophisticated cinematography, it is no doubt a movie that deserves to be seen onscreen.

Even the plot itself speaks of technical craftsmanship. As what you can expect from Nolan he overcomplicates a simple story by manipulating time and space, but this time it pays off. The miracle of Dunkirk is told through three different perspectives – from a Spitfire pilot on air, a father who volunteered in a slapdash rescue effort at sea, and a soldier trying to survive on the ground. These subplots interweave and overlap a series of events until they come together in the end.

At the same time, this non-linear plot balances tragic matter of fact moments with noble deeds that emerges from desperate times. Amidst the propulsive action signaled by a clock-ticking musical score there are moments of kindness, forgiveness and solidarity. Above all, the movie never judges any of its characters for the things they do to survive.

The cast are all given equal treatment, even the new ones – yes Harry Styles. And they all deliver sympathetic performances that help in creating characters even though we don’t know anything about them. Dunkirk focuses on the small details that make-up this single event in history and the people directly involved in the story, instead of the leaders safe elsewhere.

The result is an epic war movie that is riveting and rousing in every beat, whether its a quiet moment where the dead floats back to shore because of the tide, the temporarily safe comfort of jam on bread in a boat, or the intense dogfight in the air by pilots on limited fuel. It’s no doubt a Nolan film and his best one to date.

Dunkirk is purely a technical film but it accomplishes an original take on a war epic – its essentially a collection of eyewitness accounts of a historic event and as these accounts often are, it can be confusing, but also tragic, fascinating, and cathartic. Best of all, it isn’t jingoistic or pandering to the audience. It’s a technically accomplished story told through the lens of the people who survived it.

My Rating: 10/10

9 Comments Add yours

  1. I am generally not a war epic fan but this one has drawn me in from the first trailer-I love Tom Hardy-how do you feel about his performance, BE?

    1. Arline says:

      He can’t really do much because he’s behind a mask, but you can see his determination. Hardy is good at delivering taciturn performances so I think he was good in this. I keep hearing bane when he speaks lol.

      1. Ha Ha! For me it’s “Locke”-God he is amazing in that movie.

      2. Arline says:

        I haven’t seen that, will do.

      3. Cool-He is the only character we see speak in the movie-I won’t say any more-you may or may not be into it-still, would love to see you review it.

      4. DJ R. says:

        Not only is this yet another movie where Nolan manages to overcomplicate a story, it’s also another movie where Tom Hardy manages to cover his face haha.

  2. DJ R. says:

    I may be in the minority here, but this is the Nolan film where the non-linear narrative is non-essential. The complicated structure makes it interesting to watch, and makes the story more meaningful by reflecting the chaos of war—I concede that. Yet I feel the movie would have been just as great in terms of its emotional impact if the scenes were simply arranged chronologically.

    That said, I agree with everything else on this review. Boy, I love Nolan.

    1. Arline says:

      The crux of the movie is the difference in perspectives, so I think its better off as it is as that what Nolan intended to do. Thanks for reading!

Leave a Reply to thequickflickcritic Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.